Inventory analysis after 2025 campaign
This is a very rough interpretation of the results. Raw graphs are also shown here
This considers all dispensed glasses since the 2023 campaign and also unsuccessful searches made in (parts of) the 2024 campaign and all of the 2025 campaign.
The analysis for singlefocal is much worse than for multifocal since we have much more dispensed multifocals and therefore more data.
Check the grafana dashboard for the percentage of multi- vs. singlefocal per location.
sa single
we need
- much more of zero-ish axis (from 160 to 0 to 20) with any sphere
- also few more where at least one eye sphere is 0 specifically (and any other params)
we have
- enough with axis not zero-ish (so 50 to 120) (and at least one cylinder > 0).
sm single
we need
- more with a zero-ish axis, specifically:
- a lot more with a sphere of -1.5 to +1.5,
- some with any negative sphere and 0 to -0.5 cylinder
- also few with sphere of 0 (in at least one eye)
- MAYBE? tiny amount more of glasses with high cylinders (-1 to -4) and 160 to 0 to 20 axis
we have
- more than enough of axis around 90-ish (i.e. not close to 0 axis)
sa multi
we need
- more with with any positive spheres and 0-ish axis / zero cylinder.
- rather with higher add (i.e. bigger than 2.5) than lower (less than 2), but also some of the latter
we have
- more than enough of 90ish axis (like 70-110) (and therefore non null cylinders)
- especially for spheres higher than +1.25 much more than enough
sm multi
we need
- muuuuch more with close to 0 axis and 0 to -0.75 cylinder, any positive spheres
- some more of glasses with a smaller add value, i.e. -1 to -1.75 (and an axis that is roughly 0-ish) and any sphere
we have
- much more than enough of spheres bigger than +1.5 and non-zero cylinders
- enough of spheres bigger than 0 and non-zero cylinders
Appendix
Ignore this for now